Google co-founder Sergey Brin defends the deal:
We ultimately made a difficult decision, but we felt that by participating there, and making our services more available, even if not to the 100 percent that we ideally would like, that it will be better for Chinese Web users, because ultimately they would get more information, though not quite all of it.
I met the guy at Brainstorm, I think his name’s Xiao. Just over the years I’ve been interested in this question, and talked to three or four different people in China. My point of view really did change. And don’t forget that I was born in the Soviet Union and my early childhood was spent there, so I’m very sensitive to this kind of issue. It wasn’t easy. But I gradually grew comfortable, and I think we’re doing the right thing.
I am sympathetic to this point of view, although organizations which take this road deserve public scrutiny to make sure they don’t become complacent. It is possible to maintain one’s integrity while trying to influence oppressive policies by engaging rather than boycotting. But it ain’t easy.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin defends the deal:
We ultimately made a difficult decision, but we felt that by participating there, and making our services more available, even if not to the 100 percent that we ideally would like, that it will be better for Chinese Web users, because ultimately they would get more information, though not quite all of it.
I met the guy at Brainstorm, I think his name’s Xiao. Just over the years I’ve been interested in this question, and talked to three or four different people in China. My point of view really did change. And don’t forget that I was born in the Soviet Union and my early childhood was spent there, so I’m very sensitive to this kind of issue. It wasn’t easy. But I gradually grew comfortable, and I think we’re doing the right thing.
I am sympathetic to this point of view, although organizations which take this road deserve public scrutiny to make sure they don’t become complacent. It is possible to maintain one’s integrity while trying to influence oppressive policies by engaging rather than boycotting. But it ain’t easy.

![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://blogs.pajamasmedia.com/china_syndrome/nav-commenters.gif)
Just commented on this on my own blog. Essentially, I think that the ultimate measure of whether Google is doing good or evil is what else is Google doing? Would they be willing to give real time access to all terms that are blocked by local regulation and host it somewhere where none of the terms are blocked?
Engaging the PRC is admirable but it's only engagement if you do more than just grant their wishes. The companies that invested in S. Africa during the apartheid era engaged in systematic attempts to improve the system. Will Google do at least as well?